Tuesday, March 30, 2010

World Classic 2. The Sound and The Fury



The Sound and The Fury

By William Faulkner

Story and Bacground

The Sound and the Fury, Faulkner's fourth novel, is his first true masterpiece, and many consider it to be his finest work. It was Faulkner's own favorite novel, primarily, he says, because it is his "most splendid failure." Depicting the decline of the once-aristocratic Compson family, the novel is divided into four parts, each told by a different narrator.

The Story

The first section is told from the point of view of Benjy Compson , a thirty-three-year-old idiot, and recounts via flashbacks the earliest events in the novel. As an idiot, Benjy is the key to the novel's title , which alludes to Shakespeare's tragedy Macbeth. For the most part, his language is simple—sentences are short, vocabulary basic. Reading this section is profoundly difficult, however, because the idiot has no concept of time or place—sensory stimuli in the present bring him back to another time and place in his past, instantly and without warning (except for a change in typeface from Roman to italic).

Most of his memories concern his sister, Caddy , who is in some ways the central character in the novel. Benjy's earliest depicted memory, from 1898 (when Benjy was three years old), establishes the essence of her character—the children are ignorant of the death of their grandmother, "Damuddy ," and Caddy is the only Compson child brave enough to climb the pear tree and look through the window at the funeral wake while her brothers stand below, gazing up at her muddy drawers, which were soiled earlier when they were playing in a creek adjoining the Compson estate. Most of Benjy's other memories also focus on Caddy, who alone among the Compsons genuinely cared for Benjy. Key memories regarding Caddy include a time when she uses perfume (1905), when she loses her virginity (1909), and her wedding (1910). Benjy also recalls his name change (from Maury to Benjamin) in 1900, his brother Quentin 's suicide in 1910, and the sequence of events at the gate which lead to his being castrated, also in 1910. Reading Benjy's section is difficult, but it is not impossible. First, note that there are two characters named "Maury"—Benjy before 1900 and Mrs. Compson 's brother, "Uncle Maury" Bascomb —and there are two Quentins—Benjy's suicidal brother and Caddy's illegitimate daughter . Second, you can get some sense of the time by noting who is taking care of Benjy . Three black servants take care of Benjy at different times: Versh when Benjy is a small child, T.P. when Benjy is approximately 15 years old, and Luster in the present when Benjy is 33.

The second section recounts the story from Quentin Compson 's perspective. Even though the present-day of this section is almost eighteen years prior to the present-day of Benjy 's section, it nevertheless follows roughly the chronological development of the novel, for while many of Benjy's recollections are of their early childhood, most of Quentin's flashbacks record their adolescence, particularly Caddy 's dawning sexuality.

Quentin's section takes place on the day he commits suicide, and in the present we follow his wanderings around Boston (he is a student at Harvard University) as he fastidiously prepares for death. Like Benjy, he too is obsessed with the past and frequently lapses into flashbacks. Unlike the fairly discrete narratives of Benjy's multiple memories, however, Quentin's are much more fragmentary—a repeated (and usually italicized) word or phrase early in his section often recurs later with greater detail and embellishment. Quentin's flashbacks also are much more intellectual than Benjy's. Whereas Benjy records mainly sensual impressions, Quentin more often delves into more abstract issues such as character motivation, guilt, honor, and sin. He begins his section by contemplating time, even breaking the hands off his watch in a futile attempt to "escape" time. Another minor obsession Quentin has throughout his section is with shadows; the word "shadow" is repeated constantly throughout his section (thus recalling Shakespeare's image of a "walking shadow" in the soliloquy alluded to by the novel's title ). Alone among the present-day Compsons, Quentin still feels pride in his family's noble and glorious past, but he recognizes that today nothing remains of that past; it is mere shadow, and he is merely a "poor player" strutting and fretting, powerless to achieve anything of serious importance. Part of Quentin's mental perturbation arises from his father 's deep and unswerving cynicism and nihilism; much of his section is a sort of inner dialogue with his father, in which Quentin hopes to prove his father wrong. In fact, his suicide may be just that—his escape from time—for Mr. Compson has told Quentin that as time passes, Quentin will forget his horror, which is unacceptable to Quentin because forgetting would render his horror meaningless, and so he escapes time in the only way he can, by drowning himself. The source of Quentin's horror is Caddy . Hearkening back to antebellum views of honor, Southern womanhood, and virginity, Quentin cannot accept his sister's growing sexuality, just as he cannot accept his father's notion that "virginity" is merely an invention by men. Most of his flashbacks concern directly his involvement in Caddy's sexual maturing, but ironically they depict also just how ineffectual Quentin is. In an attempt to restore "honor" to Caddy and to the Compson family, for example, he confronts Dalton Ames , who may be the man who impregnated Caddy, but Quentin is easily overpowered by Ames—and in the present, when he mistakes a fellow student for the adversary of his flashback, Quentin gets beat up. In another incident, Quentin proposes a suicide pact with Caddy, but ultimately he cannot go through with it.

Section three is told by the third Compson brother, Jason ,and is set on Good Friday. Unlike his brothers, Jason is much more focused on the present, offering fewer flashbacks, though he does have a few and he refers frequently to events in the past. The tone of Jason's section is set instantly by the opening sentence: "Once a bitch always a bitch, what I say." Jason is a sadist, and his grimly humorous section reveals just how low the Compson family has sunk—fromQuentin 's obsessions over heritage and honor and sin to Jason's near-constant cruelty, complaints, and scheming. As earlier in the novel, this section reflects a rough chronological advancement—the focus now is not on Caddy herself (though she does appear in a few flashbacks and she often is the subject of Jason's pointed remarks) but rather on her daughter, Quentin , who came to live with the Compsons following Caddy's divorce and who is now, like Caddy inQuentin 's section, entering into adult sexuality. Much of Jason's section is about his trying to track her down when she skips school to be with a man associated with the circus then in town, but for first-time readers of the novel, Jason's section is also probably when the difficulties ofBenjy 's and Quentin 's sections begin to make sense. Among the "discoveries" here are that Quentin drowned himself (the suicide itself was not depicted in Quentin's section), that Benjy is a "gelding," that Caddy was divorced and that her daughter, also named Quentin, has come to live with the Compsons. Other things, too, are revealed more clearly: Mrs. Compson 's hypochondria, Mr. Compson's alcoholism and nihilism, and especially, Jason's meanness and greed. For years, Caddy has been sending money to her daughter, and since Mrs. Compson has forbidden Caddy's name from being mentioned in the house, she has likewise forbidden her money. To overcome this hurdle, Jason gives Mrs. Compson duplicates of Caddy's checks (for Mrs. Compson to ceremoniously burn) while he cashes the actual checks and pockets the money, giving little or none of it to his niece.

The fourth and final section is told from an omniscient viewpoint. It is sometimes known as "Dilsey 's Section" because of her prominence in this section, but she is not the sole focus in this section—a long sequence follows Jason as he pursues his niece , who has stolen about $7,000 from him, to "Mottson ." The focus here is entirely upon the present-day, Easter Sunday, and to that end, all traces of Caddy, including her daughter and even the very mention of her name, have been removed. The two main narratives presented in this section are fairly straightforward: Jason's pursuit of his stolen money and his inevitable come-uppance when he insults the wrong man in Mottson; and Dilsey's attendance at an Easter church service, at which a preacher from St. Louis,Reverend Shegog , delivers a sermon which stirs in Dilsey an epiphany of doom for the Compson family. As she says, following the service, "I've seed de first en de last ... I seed de beginnin, en now I sees de endin."

As the novel ends, the two narratives again converge: Luster has secured permission to drive Benjy to the graveyard, and both he and Jason arrive at the courthouse square inJefferson at about the same time. But Luster goes past a Confederate soldier on the "wrong" side, which causes Benjy to start crying. Jason approaches, hits Luster, and tells him to take Benjy home. And thus, the novel ends: "[Benjy's] broken flower drooped over Ben's fist and his eyes were empty and blue and serene again as cornice and façade flowed smoothly once more from left to right, post and tree, window and doorway and signboard each in its ordered place."

Background

According to Faulkner, the story began with a vision of a little girl's muddy drawers as she climbed a tree to look at death while her brothers, lacking her courage, waited below:

I tried first to tell it with one brother, and that wasn't enough. That was Section One. I tried it with another brother, and that wasn't enough. That was Section Two. I tried the third brother, because Caddy was still to me too beautiful and too moving to reduce her to telling what was going on, that it would be more passionate to see her through somebody else's eyes, I thought. And that failed and I tried myself—the fourth section— to tell what happened, and I still failed.[1]

Faulkner added a fifth attempt to tell Caddy Compson's story in 1945, when he wrote an "Appendix " to the novel to be included in The Portable Faulkner then being assembled for Viking Press by Malcolm Cowley. "I should have done this when I wrote the book," Faulkner told Cowley. "Then the whole thing would have fallen into pattern like a jigsaw puzzle when the magician's wand touched it." In the Appendix, titled "Compson 1699-1945" (to resemble an obituary), Faulkner offers some additional glimpses into Compson family lore, both from the clan's aristocratic past and in the years following the dates in the novel. Before Faulkner wrote The Sound and the Fury, he had written a book which he thought was to be the book that would make his name as a writer. He wrote his publisher, "I have written THE book, of which those other things were but foals. I believe it is the damdest best book you'll look at this year, and any other publisher." That manuscript was Flags in the Dust, and it would not be published until eleven years after Faulkner's death. The discouragement of having Flags turned down, and then severely cut by his friend Ben Wasson into what would be published asSartoris, apparently led Faulkner to begin writing a book entirely for himself, and publishers be damned. That book, originally titled "Twilight," was The Sound and the Fury. Later, Faulkner would say it was the novel he felt most "tender" toward because it had caused him "the most grief and anguish."

Structure, Technique, and Criticism

None of Faulkner's novels has generated as much critical response as The Sound and the Fury. Because of the sheer abundance of published criticism on the novel, not to mention the vastly divergent opinions and interpretations of the novel, any effort here at commentary on the novel must necessarily fall short. Still, there are some things on which critics agree. Few dispute that the novel depicts a "tragedy," the decline of the Compson family. There is agreement too that much of the novel is told in a stream-of-consciousness style, in which a character's unadorned thoughts are conveyed in a manner roughly equivalent to the way our minds actually work. Themes critics continuously note in the novel are order, honor, sin. And nearly all critics consider it a technical masterpiece for the way Faulkner incorporates four distinct narrative modes in telling the story of a little girl with muddy drawers. But as any great literary work should, The Sound and the Fury invites a number of approaches, methods, and philosophies to those who would interpret it. Nearly every reader agrees that Caddy Compson is a key, if not the key character in the novel, though critics differ in how prominent her role should be. Much has been made, too, of the religious backdrop of the story. The present-day setting of Easter has led some critics to question whether Benjy is some ironic modern-day Christ figure—his age (thirty-three), in particular, is suggestive of Christ at the time of his crucifixion. Still others view parallels between Dilsey and the "suffering servant" of Isaiah.

The Sound and the Fury

The Title

The title and some of the imagery in the novel derive from a soliloquy by the title character in Shakespeare's tragedy , following the death of his wife, and as he begins to realize his dire situation, Macbeth speaks his "Tomorrow" soliloquy:

To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time,
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of
sound and fury
Signifying nothing.

The Sound and the Fury

General Comments: It is certainly worth ploughing through if you want to stretch your brain and think about life and death and consciousness. Most people will dismiss this book in the first few pages - it is notoriously difficult to get to grips with, and actually requires two readings before it starts to make any sense. But, as a reflection on the incomprehensible nature of life, that's not bad. Most of us make little or no sense of our three score years and ten; in relative terms The Sound & the Fury is a breeze! This is a tragic story, and all the more so for the choked narrative voice of the dead. The repression in these pages is countered by the rebellious and almost unpunctuated text, and the contrast is stunning. It soon dawns on you - as a reader who is impatient at the challenge to traditional literature - that we're all victims of a man-made environment, and by social mores that cripple and destroy our souls. Faulkner's novel is not, by any stretch, the most enjoyable or entertaining that you will ever read. But it is certainly one of the most brave writings, and I would recommend it highly if you want to confront your own demons.

The ostensible subject of The Sound and the Fury is the dissolution of the Compsons, one of those august old Mississippi families that fell on hard times and wild eccentricity after the Civil War. But in fact what William Faulkner is really after in his legendary novel is the kaleidoscope of consciousness--the overwrought mind caught in the act of thought. His rich, dark, scandal-ridden story of squandered fortune, incest (in thought if not in deed), madness, congenital brain damage, theft, illegitimacy, and stoic endurance is told in the interior voices of three Compson brothers: first Benjy, the "idiot" man-child who blurs together three decades of inchoate sensations as he stalks the fringes of the family's former pasture; next Quentin, torturing himself brilliantly, obsessively over Caddy's lost virginity and his own failure to recover the family's honor as he wanders around the seedy fringes of Boston; and finally Jason, heartless, shrewd, sneaking, nursing a perpetual sense of injury and outrage against his outrageous family. If Benjy's section is the most daringly experimental, Jason's is the most harrowing. "Once a bitch always a bitch, what I say," he begins, lacing into Caddy's illegitimate daughter, and then proceeds to hurl mud at blacks, Jews, his sacred Compson ancestors, his glamorous, promiscuous sister, his doomed brother Quentin, his ailing mother, and the long-suffering black servant Dilsey who holds the family together by sheer force of character. Notoriously "difficult," The Sound and the Fury is actually one of Faulkner's more accessible works once you get past the abrupt, unannounced time shifts--and certainly the most powerful emotionally. Everything is here: the complex equilibrium of pre-civil rights race relations; the conflict between Yankee capitalism and Southern agrarian values; a meditation on time, consciousness, and Western philosophy. And all of it is rendered in prose so gorgeous it can take your breath away. Here, for instance, Quentin recalls an autumnal encounter back home with the old black possum hunter Uncle Louis: And we'd sit in the dry leaves that whispered a little with the slow respiration of our waiting and with the slow breathing of the earth and the windless October, the rank smell of the lantern fouling the brittle air, listening to the dogs and to the echo of Louis' voice dying away. He never raised it, yet on a still night we have heard it from our front porch. When he called the dogs in he sounded just like the horn he carried slung on his shoulder and never used, but clearer, mellower, as though his voice were a part of darkness and silence, coiling out of it, coiling into it again. WhoOoooo. WhoOoooo. WhoOooooooooooooooo. What Faulkner has created is a modernist epic in which characters assume the stature of gods and the primal family events resonate like myths. It is The Sound and the Fury that secures his place in what Edmund Wilson called "the full-dressed post-Flaubert group of Conrad, Joyce, and Proust."

Review

The ostensible subject of The Sound and the Fury is the dissolution of the Compsons, one of those august old Mississippi families that fell on hard times and wild eccentricity after the Civil War. But in fact what William Faulkner is really after in his legendary novel is the kaleidoscope of consciousness--the overwrought mind caught in the act of thought. His rich, dark, scandal-ridden story of squandered fortune, incest (in thought if not in deed), madness, congenital brain damage, theft, illegitimacy, and stoic endurance is told in the interior voices of three Compson brothers: first Benjy, the "idiot" man-child who blurs together three decades of inchoate sensations as he stalks the fringes of the family's former pasture; next Quentin, torturing himself brilliantly, obsessively over Caddy's lost virginity and his own failure to recover the family's honor as he wanders around the seedy fringes of Boston; and finally Jason, heartless, shrewd, sneaking, nursing a perpetual sense of injury and outrage against his outrageous family. If Benjy's section is the most daringly experimental, Jason's is the most harrowing. "Once a bitch always a bitch, what I say," he begins, lacing into Caddy's illegitimate daughter, and then proceeds to hurl mud at blacks, Jews, his sacred Compson ancestors, his glamorous, promiscuous sister, his doomed brother Quentin, his ailing mother, and the long-suffering black servant Dilsey who holds the family together by sheer force of character. Notoriously "difficult," The Sound and the Fury is actually one of Faulkner's more accessible works once you get past the abrupt, unannounced time shifts--and certainly the most powerful emotionally. Everything is here: the complex equilibrium of pre-civil rights race relations; the conflict between Yankee capitalism and Southern agrarian values; a meditation on time, consciousness, and Western philosophy. And all of it is rendered in prose so gorgeous it can take your breath away. Here, for instance, Quentin recalls an autumnal encounter back home with the old black possum hunter Uncle Louis: And we'd sit in the dry leaves that whispered a little with the slow respiration of our waiting and with the slow breathing of the earth and the windless October, the rank smell of the lantern fouling the brittle air, listening to the dogs and to the echo of Louis' voice dying away. He never raised it, yet on a still night we have heard it from our front porch. When he called the dogs in he sounded just like the horn he carried slung on his shoulder and never used, but clearer, mellower, as though his voice were a part of darkness and silence, coiling out of it, coiling into it again. WhoOoooo. WhoOoooo. WhoOooooooooooooooo. What Faulkner has created is a modernist epic in which characters assume the stature of gods and the primal family events resonate like myths. It is The Sound and the Fury that secures his place in what Edmund Wilson called "the full-dressed post-Flaubert group of Conrad, Joyce, and Proust."

Monday, March 29, 2010

World Classic 1 Sons and Lovers




Sons and Lovers, regarded as D.H. Lawrence’s masterpiece stands ninth in the list of one hundred best fiction titles drawn by the Publishers Guild. One wonders whether it is a novel or perhaps even a long short story. Because the reader has a feeling that Lawrence does not have enough material to fill over four hundred and odd pages. We may find waiting for something big to happen while the author reiterates, painfully yet convincingly, the same set of human emotions in similar scenes again and again. But the theme and the story telling technique are something unique, for they remain etched in the minds of the readers.

Sons and Lovers is an epic tale of an English family and its relationships to each member. It highlights the mythic of conflict between a mother and her son, a recurring theme in western myth and religion. It is the famous psychologist Sigmund Freud who first postulated that fathers are antagonists to their sons, while the sons themselves are bonded to their mothers. To Freud mother is the object of desire in her son’s psyche. This is the so-called Oedipus complex. Mother is at the heart of all conflicts in most mythological stories, and she is the ultimate threshold guardian to the hero’s guarded entry into a higher plane of consciousness and wisdom. Lawrence in Sons and Lovers handles this cyclical nature of myth through the generational passing of sons of a family becoming adults.

Keeping Oedipus complex at its base Sons and Lovers tells us the story of its hero, Paul, and his relationship with his mother. Paul is hopelessly devoted to his mother, and their love often borders on romantic desire. Lawrence writes many scenes between the two that go beyond the bounds of conventional mother-son love. To complete the oedipal equation, Paul hates his father and often dreams of his death. Paul’s love for his mother is often transferred to two girls of his romantic interests, Miriam and Clara. But he feels guilty at the thought of his waiting mother, which invariably leads to misery and infighting that ends in his loneliness.


Storyline

Sons and Lovers is set in the small coalmining town of Bestwood, England, in the backdrop of the new industrial age.

Miss.Gertrude Coppard meets a rough and muscular miner, by name Walter Morel, at a Christmas dance and falls head over heels in love. But soon after her marriage to the miner she realizes the difficulties of living off her husband’s meager salary in a rented house. The couple often fights and Walter, after a day’s work, retreats to the bar and takes to drinking. Gradually, Mrs. Morel's affections shift to her sons, beginning with the first son, William. As a boy, William is so attached to his mother that he doesn't even enjoy the company of friends or outdoor life. As he grows older, he defends her against his father's occasional violence. Eventually, he leaves home for a job in London, where he begins to rise up into the middle class. He is engaged, but he detests the girl's superficiality. When he dies in London Mrs. Morel is heartbroken. But when Paul, her second son, catches pneumonia, she rediscovers her love. This time her love for Paul is so deep and complete that she neglects her husband. The story now starts revolving around the relationship between Paul and his mother. She puts her heart and soul in the upbringing of the teenage son, Paul. Both share a very emotional and loving relationship. The mother does not have a happy married life and Paul does not like his father.

Paul works in a surgical appliances factory. As a result of working in the factory, he falls sick and is nursed back to health by one Miriam Leivers and he falls in love with her. Miriam is a girl of very religious bent of mind. Both share a completely platonic and intense relationship which is at once disliked by Paul’s mother, for she feels that Miriam is trying to steal her son away from her. Paul is afraid to leave his mother though he wants to go out on his own and experience love. The lovers often take long walks and have intellectual conversations about books. Miriam’s intense religious temperament is resented by both Paul and his mother. And Miriam does not like the mother’s over protective attitude towards her son. Time passes by, and Paul reaches his 20’s. Now he is quite passionate and romantic and makes love to Miriam, thus putting an end to his early rapturous innocent relation with her as he does not want to get stuck up in marriage. Paul begins to resist her further advances, and his mother looks down on Miriam. The lovers drift apart.

At work, Paul meets Clara Dawes, a married older woman who has left her husband. But this relationship is also bound to doom as Clara’s husband, Baxter Dawes, one day returns and beats up Paul for having sex with his wife. Paul’s mother is detected with the presence of a tumor and eventually dies only to be remembered by her son. Paul brings about a reunion between Clara and her husband by befriending both of them. Miriam, his first love returns and appeals to Paul to marry her. But he refuses and gets lost in his own inner darkness.

This is a story of a man and his emotional relationship with three women, mostly with his mother, that leads to many catastrophes in their respective lives. At the end he is left alone. The novel is a sad and poignant story of a mother and her son and their relationship that remains intact in the mind of the son even after the mother’s death.